Residents Continue to Wait for Action on PFAS Contamination

Frustration Grows in Jersey Over Delays in PFAS Response Near Airport

Residents in Jersey impacted by the presence of toxic “forever chemicals” near the island’s airport have voiced mounting frustration over what they describe as slow and inadequate government action.

A third draft report into polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and measures to support those potentially exposed was released this week, but many locals say progress has been far too slow.

At a public meeting held at St Brelade Parish Hall, several attendees expressed dissatisfaction, saying they had seen little meaningful action since the PFAS Scientific Advisory Panel was established in 2023.

“We’ve had report one, two, and now three—and we’re still waiting,” said Joan Renouf, a local resident. “We’re in exactly the same position as two years ago. It’s all talk, but nothing’s actually happened.”

PFAS chemicals—widely used in industrial applications and known for their persistence in the environment—are believed to have entered nearby water sources after being used in firefighting foam at Jersey Airport in the 1990s. Exposure to PFAS has been linked to serious health conditions, including certain cancers and fertility problems.

The government’s third draft report includes 13 recommendations, among them blood testing, bloodletting, and the potential use of a cholesterol-lowering medication called Colesevelam for individuals who meet specific criteria.

Professor Peter Bradley, Jersey’s Director of Public Health, said the final report is expected in early June. He acknowledged delays but insisted that steps were being taken.

“There shouldn’t be too much time delay before recommendations are implemented,” Prof Bradley said. “The most advised treatment currently is the cholesterol-lowering drug, which appears to be effective, although there will always be exceptions.”

Some residents, however, remain skeptical.

“It took two years just to get to this stage,” said Claire Simon, who also attended the meeting. “How long will it take to see real action? I’m concerned the government will go with the cheapest option, not the one that best protects the health of the people.”

Authorities have invited public feedback on the draft report, which remains open for comment until April 24.