Amendment Filed Over Redevelopment Plan Costs

A proposal to halt the redevelopment of a major Jersey leisure facility has been formally submitted, casting doubt over the future of the long-planned upgrade to Fort Regent in St Helier.

Although funding for the refurbishment was included in the government’s budget, Deputy Sir Philip Bailhache has tabled an amendment arguing the project carries an unaffordable price tag.

“Jersey cannot afford to spend £110m”

Questions over how the scheme would be financed surfaced earlier this month. Ministers have said the government intends to borrow £43 million for the first phase, while a further £67 million would be allocated in subsequent budgets.

In his accompanying report, Sir Philip warned that, without tax rises, “Jersey cannot afford to spend £110m” on the redevelopment, adding that “borrowing is not the answer”.

He acknowledged the leisure centre had long brought enjoyment to islanders, but noted its deterioration and closure on safety grounds had challenged several administrations. While he supports the redevelopment “in broad terms”, he said the financial strategy behind it remains his chief concern.

“The budget proposes borrowing £43m for Phase One,” he wrote. “But Phase Two is expected to cost £67m, meaning the Assembly is effectively being asked to approve at least £110m of borrowing for the restoration of Fort Regent — a colossal sum.”

According to Sir Philip, servicing that level of debt would cost the island more than £8 million annually. Given the island’s current financial pressures and wider global uncertainty, he argued the project would not be viable without raising taxes.

The amendment will go before the States Assembly during December’s broader budget discussions.